
The UAE Bankruptcy Law, Federal Decree-Law 51 of 2023, carries a chapter for the kind of shock a business cannot plan for: an epidemic, a natural disaster, a war. It calls this an Emergency Financial Crisis and defines it as an event that disturbs a debtor’s financial position, to the point of being unable to pay, because of a wider situation affecting trade or investment in the state. The list of examples is illustrative, not closed. The chapter does not switch itself on. The Cabinet has to declare the crisis, its cause and its duration, on a proposal from the Minister. It has now done so. Cabinet Decision 94 of 2026 triggered Title Five for proceedings resulting from what the decision describes as the Iranian acts of aggression against the UAE, effective from 28 February 2026 and running until the Council of Ministers decides otherwise. The legal account below follows the review published by Economy Middle East on 15 September 2026, written by Michael Kortbawi, Senior Partner at BSA Law. The commercial property read that follows it is ours.
| Standard route | Under Title Five |
|---|---|
| Court-appointed trustee runs the process | Proceedings can move without a trustee |
| Formal preventive settlement, restructuring or bankruptcy | Up to 40 days of direct negotiation between debtor and creditors |
| Settlement terms set through the court process | Any settlement is capped at 12 months |
| Creditors bound only through the formal plan | Two thirds of participating debt, by value, binds every creditor, including those who did not take part |
| Creditors may start proceedings | Debtors are protected from creditor-initiated proceedings for the duration of the crisis |
| Assets exposed to precautionary measures | Business-essential assets are shielded |
| Deadlines as set | Procedural deadlines on pre-existing cases can be doubled |
A restructuring without cash is half a rescue. Article 257 lets the Bankruptcy Court authorise new financing, secured or unsecured, once the debtor’s application for preventive settlement or restructuring has been approved under Article 252. That new money ranks ahead of the debtor’s existing ordinary debt and can be secured on any asset the debtor has not already mortgaged. The mechanics are those of ordinary preventive settlement financing, run inside the faster crisis structure. None of it removes the court: every stage stays under the Bankruptcy Court’s supervision.
A tenant that invokes Title Five is a debtor, and unpaid rent makes the landlord a creditor like any other. Three things follow, and the first two cut against the landlord. For the duration of the crisis the landlord cannot start proceedings against the tenant, so the eviction and rent-recovery route is closed while the regime applies to that tenant. If two thirds of the tenant’s participating creditors by value accept a settlement, the landlord is bound by it whether or not they were in the room, and a landlord is rarely the largest creditor in a business: the bank and the trade suppliers usually are. The third is the protection: the 40 days. A landlord who is at the table, with the arrears documented and a proposal ready (a rent deferral against a longer term, a step-down with a personal guarantee, a surrender of part of the floor), shapes the settlement. One who waits for the notice receives it. The settlement itself is capped at 12 months. Whatever a tenant negotiates, it is a year of relief, not a rewritten lease, and the lease terms return at the end of it. Multi-let buildings carry this better than single-let ones: one tenant in Title Five on one floor is a rent gap, one tenant in Title Five across the whole building is a covenant problem.
For a business that owns its office, shop or warehouse, Title Five reads the other way. Business-essential assets are protected from precautionary measures for the duration, and the premises a company trades from are the clearest example of an essential asset there is. A creditor cannot attach the building while the company negotiates. A bank holding a mortgage on those premises keeps its security; what changes is that new financing under Article 257 can be raised on any part of the property that is not already mortgaged, ahead of the ordinary creditors. For an owner-occupier with headroom in the asset, that is the route to the cash a 40-day settlement needs.
An office in Business Bay, a retail unit on Al Reem, a warehouse in Dubai South: each pays a yield that is only as strong as the tenant behind it. Under Title Five a tenant in distress can bind its landlord to a year of reduced or deferred rent, and the landlord cannot enforce in the meantime. The questions to ask of any commercial unit now are not about the building. Who is the tenant, how exposed is its trade to the declared crisis, how long is left on the lease, and is there a personal or corporate guarantee sitting behind it? A unit let to a regional bank on a ten-year term and a unit let to a single-market trader on a two-year term were priced within a few points of each other in 2025. They are not the same asset in 2026. The other side of that is opportunity. A company using its 12-month settlement to raise cash is a motivated seller of the property it owns but does not need, and a sale-and-leaseback of premises it does need is exactly the kind of transaction a settlement is built around. Well-capitalised buyers with cleared funds, who can complete inside a settlement timetable, will see stock in 2026 and 2027 that was not for sale in 2025.
A buyer of an office or retail unit under construction is exposed to the developer and the contractor, and both are businesses that can invoke Title Five if their distress traces to the crisis. The money is not the exposure. In Abu Dhabi, Law 2 of 2025 routes every instalment into a project-specific escrow account released against verified construction milestones; Dubai has run the same discipline under its escrow law since 2007. Escrow money is held for the project rather than owned by the developer, so it is not the pool a settlement negotiates over. The exposure is time: a contractor negotiating a 12-month settlement is a contractor buying a year, and a handover date moves with it. A settlement that keeps the company trading and the site working is also what stops a stalled project, which is the outcome the regime is designed to prevent.
Landlords: pull the arrears ledger on every commercial tenant, know who else they owe, and have a settlement proposal drafted before anyone invokes anything. Owner-occupiers: know what headroom sits in your premises above the mortgage, because that is Article 257 money if you need it. Investors: read the tenant, the term and the guarantee before the yield, and hold funds ready for what the settlements bring to market. Buyers of commercial units off plan: confirm the escrow account on the agreement and the project’s registration with ADREC or RERA, which is the protection whether or not any developer ever needs Title Five. The decision runs until the Cabinet ends it. We will update this piece when the Council of Ministers sets a close date or extends the crisis definition. Our commercial desk reads any lease, unit or building against it on request.
Title Five of the Bankruptcy Law, Federal Decree-Law 51 of 2023: a faster, debtor-led route for businesses whose distress traces to a declared crisis. Cabinet Decision 94 of 2026 switched it on from 28 February 2026 for proceedings resulting from the crisis the decision names, until the Cabinet decides otherwise.
Not for the duration of the crisis. The tenant is protected from creditor-initiated proceedings, and a settlement approved by two thirds of its participating debt by value binds the landlord even if they did not take part. The landlord’s leverage is the 40-day negotiation, and a settlement is capped at 12 months, after which the lease terms return.
A lender already holding a mortgage keeps its security. What changes is that new financing authorised by the Bankruptcy Court under Article 257 ranks ahead of existing ordinary debt and can be secured on any part of the premises not already mortgaged, and the premises themselves are shielded from precautionary measures as a business-essential asset.
Off-plan instalments in the UAE sit in project escrow accounts released against construction milestones (Abu Dhabi Law 2 of 2025, Dubai’s escrow law), held for the project rather than owned by the developer, so they are not the money a Title Five settlement negotiates over. The realistic exposure is a delayed handover.
The tenant’s trade and its exposure to the declared crisis, the unexpired term, and whether a personal or corporate guarantee sits behind the lease. A yield is only as strong as the covenant paying it, and a tenant under Title Five can bind its landlord to a year of reduced rent.
For buyers with cleared funds, yes. Companies raising cash inside a 12-month settlement sell property they own but do not need, and sale-and-leaseback of premises they do need is the kind of transaction a settlement is built around. Expect stock in 2026 and 2027 that was not for sale in 2025.
